Engineering and Psychology

Engineering and Psychology are two sciences that are on opposite sides of the scientific field. Engineering is application of the “hard sciences” while psychology is considered “soft science”. The two are very distinct courses that it’s not easy to make a comparison between them. Nonetheless, this paper aims to compare these two majors and investigate points of differences and intersection of Engineering and Psychology.

First, comparing the two disciplines as degrees, Engineering is a degree focused on technology and application of sciences such as chemistry, mathematics, physics, economics, etc. On the other hand, Psychology deals with human behavior and the fields related to it are biology, anthropology, history, and other social sciences. It is difficult to choose which among the two is more challenging to study merely by the field related to them. One might argue that Engineering is more challenging because of advanced mathematics and physics involved in it, but then again, Psychology deals with something not directly observable as neuroscience and human behavior. In the end, a student’s choice on what course to take is more dependent on their personal preference and which one they feel they will be good at. For example, a student good in math and drawing/drafting is more likely to choose Engineering while a student who is social and good in dealing with different kinds of people might prefer Psychology.

Another point of comparison are the subject courses for each discipline. Students must also consider these subjects that they need to complete to finish their degree. For instance, psychology majors require some subjects such as Biology, History, Social Studies, and theories of personality. Engineering majors require completing subjects like advance Mathematics, Chemistry, Computer Science, and Physics. Both require general education subjects like English, basic Maths, Statistics and Economics. General education is one point of intersection of Engineering and Psychology, which is a similarity that they also share with other degree courses.

With regards to how long it takes to finish Psychology and Engineering, both majors need a certain number of units (more or less 180 units) and both courses require around 5 years to complete. In some countries, Psychology is only a 4-year course while Engineering courses are 5-year courses. However, these are just prescribed lengths of time to finish the major. In reality, some subjects in Engineering like Math and Physics are hard to pass and it causes delay to engineering students. These subjects are higher Maths and Physics and are generally more complex. At worst, many engineering students drop these subjects that they could not continue to get the degree. If a student wants to have a degree faster, he or she might favor Psychology for the reason stated above. It doesn’t mean though that Psychology is really easier as a major—it’s only shorter in terms of course duration.  Psychology majors have to deal with difficult subjects too like neuroscience which is a relatively new field and concepts that are very complex and cannot be easily understood and applied to the physical world. Both majors have a challenge when it comes to coursework.

Sometimes, students favor Engineering over Psychology because of the belief that there are more jobs and that salary is better. Although this is not exactly true, salary and availability of job affects student’s choice of a major to pursue. For example in the United States of America, the average annual salary of a Psychologist is $72, 805, which is very close to an Electrical Engineer’s annual salary ($72, 338). This shows that it is not necessarily true that Engineers get paid more than Psychologists. In fact, because practicing psychologists are fewer, the field has become highly specialized, hence they get paid a little bit more.

After students get the degree and during job search, both psychology and engineering graduates’ proof of qualifications for the interview is their degree diploma. However, engineering graduates can get additional credentials by getting an engineer’s license through board exams. A license an advantage of engineering majors because it increases their chance of finding a job, but it is another difficult step for engineering majors. Fortunately because of the boom in construction and production throughout the world, there is a high need for engineers as opposed to psychologist. For example, imagine a company that is related to manufacturing, construction, or retail. There is less need for a psychology major to handle human resources and there will be more need for engineer to handle projects and processes. Therefore, if the same number of engineers and psychologist graduate in one term, there will be more unemployed psychology graduates.

Most often they pursue other related fields like psychiatry, human resource, and training. An alternative that is both available to engineering and psychiatry is the field of research and education. Graduates that were not able to get a job in the industry can opt for research work or work as an instructor or university professor. Like many other students who work in the science field, you can read about this in the essay about science.

In sum, Engineering and Psychology are two very different majors—Engineering focuses on technologies and structures while Psychology deals with human behavior. Although they are very different, students of both majors face challenges in coursework, as well as in employment.

Working Around Engineering Essays – Key Steps to Follow

The technicality of the field of engineering means that the approach to writing essays is highly unique. This is so because of the quantitatives involved, explanations involved, as well as the inferencing.

Notably, an engineering essay is not your usual essay in other disciplines that would majorly or entirely feature theoretical work. Engineering essays, to some extent, involve infusing numbers, explaining those numbers, and coming up with supporting information or documentation that will help to bolster or back up those numbers. It is undoubtedly not a walk in the park, but breaking down the writing process makes the whole thing easier.

Provide a Background to the Essay

It is highly essential to lay out some background or pretext that informs the essay. The essay might touch on a particular area which might be familiar to readers, but since essays are geared towards bringing up new information; reviewing existing information on the field is so important, and even more when it comes to engineering.

Giving an overview and not-so-detailed will help to bring informed readers up to speed with what you are working on. This will help ensure that they are in the know of the exact scope of focus of the content or essay they are about to read.

Get Your Quantitatives Right

Engineering is an area that involves a lot of math, calculations as well as quantitative analyses. In this regard, the essay you are working on may require you to juggle up some numbers in between. The chances are very high that numbers will be involved when writing an engineering essay.

In this sense, to avoid contradictions in your explanations, you have to ensure that you get the math right. Accurate numbers will be essential in the writing process, as they will make it easier for you to come up with your content, and most importantly, to explain and expound on it in a detailed manner. You could use Math applications to increase your accuracy.

Work on Supporting Information

When you come up with quantitatives in your essay, then that is not the end. You cannot just throw numbers in the essay without explaining what they mean or how they fit in the essay that you are working on. Even in essays that tend to lean on qualitatives heavily, there is a need to come up with supporting information in the body of your essay.

Such information should be relevant to the topic under review and should be concisely and accurately written. You stand to highly churn out a quality write-up if you ensure that your supporting information is properly written, and well within the scope of the topic or mainstay of the essay.

Reiterate Inferences and Main Take-Aways

This will help to effectively serve as the final or concluding parts of your essay. Just like any other essay that involves coming up with findings and explaining them in summary form at the end, engineering essays also follow a similar format.

You need to ensure that you reiterate the inferences you observed in your essay writing process. Highlighting the main take-aways will also help to bring out the main areas of focus of your essay, and make it easy for informed and uninformed readers to grasp a point or two from the essay.

To sum this up, engineering essays are a bit different from essays in other fields, and they may thus necessitate some unique writing procedures. You need to ensure that you follow a set of methods that will help to explain your case adequately.

Even after all these instructions it’s might be hard to decide how to start your essay in this case you can use this engineering essay as a reference for your work.

Rational Moral Agents: Intrinsic or Extrinsic Value

The intrinsic value of anything entails the value that it possesses or that it has for its sake. The philosophers often regard the concept of inherent value to be sufficiently clear in saying that the value of something is for its sake as opposed to being valuable for the sake of another thing that relates to the item in question in some way (Mark Woods, 2010). On the other hand, an object is regarded to have extrinsic value if its value is dependent on something else. Throughout the previous decades, there has been evidence pointing out to the eruption of substantial environmental struggles across Australia. The involvement of some of the philosophers in the campaigns regarding the ecological conservation has contributed significantly to the emergence of the debate on the moral obligations concerning the preservation of the environment. As such, the paper suggests that the rational agents often have the moral responsibility of ensuring effectiveness in the conservation of the biosphere since both the plants and animals have intrinsic moral values.

Intrinsic value

Numerous scholars associate nature with the intrinsic value. The intrinsic value is in some instances considered inherent worth or value. The inherent values often fall within the philosophical domains of metaethics, which refers to the meaning, and position of the moral language. Despite the presence of some level of confusion regarding the meaning of the term ‘intrinsic value,’ ensuring effectiveness in operating through the present uncertainty is crucial to the projects in environmental ethics in addressing the issues that the environment faces.

Some scholars often claim that values tend to be subjectively messy, indecisive, and are best excluded from the seemingly severe scientific and discussions on the policies concerning the issues that the environment faces. There is the necessity for noting that quantifying and measuring values is impossible. Moreover, the value preferences often seem to be no different from the choices for the various flavors of juice. The effectiveness of science is such case is evident in its description and explanation of what encompasses the environmental issues and in predicting what might happen if something happens first. Science is thus incapable of advising what to do and what not to do. There is thus the necessity for ensuring effectiveness in making ethical judgments stemming from our declared values, enter dialogues with one other and ensure arrival at certain form of intersubjective agreement concerning the management of the environmental issues that emerge. The values are thus crucial in facilitating resolution of the different environmental problems that arise.

Studies suggest that there is the consensual acceptance that nature has instrumental value for every individual. Nature encompasses both the consumable and non-consumable natural resources. However, the question of whether nature had intrinsic value tends to raise debates from the different scholars. For instance, Richard Routley created a thought experiment with the aim of determining whether nature has intrinsic value. The thought experiment mainly entails the philosopher asking people to imagine of an Earth survived by only one man. However, before the death of the man, he goes ahead to eliminate every living thing, both the animals and plants. The philosopher proceeds to question whether the activities of the man in such case are morally objectionable. In such instances, if the response is ‘yes’ then you subscribe to the non-anthropocentric environmental ethic whereby the nonhuman nature is associated with an intrinsic non-instrumental a value. On the other hand, if the response is ‘no’ then the respondent in such case subscribes to the human centered environmental ethic whereby only the humans remain as the only things associated with the intrinsic value.

Additionally, beyond the anthropocentrism, one’s location of the intrinsic value often play a significant role in determining the kind of environmental ethics to which a particular individual or group subscribe. The philosophers consider the presence of the intrinsic value amongst the nonhuman animals as a zoocentric environmental ethic. In some instances, it is often regarded as sentientism whereby the focus is mainly on the ability to experience pleasure or pain. The presence of the intrinsic value of non-human animals and plants is often referred to as biocentric environmental ethic. On the other hand, ecocentric ecological ethic mainly refers to the holistic biological and ecological entities that include species and ecosystems having intrinsic values.

The philosopher Dale Jameison considers intrinsic value as the ‘gold standard’ of morality since the items that possesses intrinsic value often have the ultimate moral values. However, the important question that arises from consideration of the perspectives of the different philosophers entails what intrinsic value is in actual sense. There is the necessity for noting that its use is usually common in different senses. The first sense involves its consideration as useful in referring to the non-instrumental values. An item is regarded to have instrumental value if it is capable of being used for another thing. In such case, that something else is considered to have intrinsic value. As such, it is valid to say that money often has intrinsic value for individuals having intrinsic value.

The second sense entails the fact that intrinsic value is applicable as criteria for moral standing. Therefore ensuring that something counts morally or transform into a form that the philosophers regard as morally considerable, it must have intrinsic value. In such case, the intrinsic value refers to the ticket that facilitates the admission of something into the moral community. Mathews, (2010) asserts that people often have intrinsic value and hence are ending in themselves.

The third sense entails the fact that comprehension of the inherent value of the things having intrinsic values is attributable to the fact that the value of such things often depends on the factors that inhere with the thing itself. Mathews, (2010) considers intrinsic value in such sense evident in his consideration of the item as a non-relational property. The non-relational nature of the item mainly arises from the assertion that its value is independent of any other thing. Therefore, in this sense, something associated with an intrinsic value often stands in contrast to the things that have extrinsic value, hence leading to the comprehension of the notion that the extrinsic value tends to exhibit external dependence on something else (Michael, 2014).

The fourth sense argues that the things are having intrinsic values often posses the objective values in the sense that its value tens to exhibit independence of the valuations of individuals that value the items. Such is often regarded as a mind-independent value because the value usually exists in the object irrespective of whether people perceive it or not.

There is necessity for noting that the first and second senses of the intrinsic value tend to appear as if they encapsulate similar idea that another thing having intrinsic value is an end in itself since it has its own moral standing and since it serves as where the instrumental value ends. On the other hand, the third and fourth senses appear as if they are encapsulating another similar notion. The idea is that the things having intrinsic values often tend to exhibit self-sufficiency since its value is not often dependent on anything else and since its value as well is not usually dependent on the human valuers.

The fourth sense of the intrinsic value thus often appears as a realist account since the presence of the value is usually confirmed and in such instance independent of the valuers. However, there is the necessity for noting that the statement that the values exist independently often comes as a surprise to some individuals. Perhaps, there is some intrinsic value whose subsistence is dependent on the valuers. Such is referred to as subjectivist account whereby there is a projection of value as an attitude from a human a subject that in the present case intrinsic valuation of something is possible. Majority of the environmental philosophers often tend to question whether the realist account of the subjective account or intrinsic value of intrinsically valuing is often more satisfactory and makes for a better metaethical grounding for the environmental ethic.

Some of the environmental pragmatists often argue that there is the necessity for giving up on the idea of intrinsic value in its entirety since it is associated with numerous theoretical issues and it is not pragmatically useful for ensuring effective development of the environmental ethics. The ecological pragmatists in such case often propose that all value is often extrinsic and that all that people have are rather webs of value that interrelate. The non-pragmatists often worry that if everything has this kind of value then it seems that the value of every other thing is usually for the sake of another thing (Thomas, 1983). However, there lacks clarity on what that something else implies.

The discussion on the intrinsic value thus plays a significant role in facilitating making of the appropriate judgments concerning conservation of the environment. From the discussion, it is evident that understanding the components of values is a significant step towards resolution of some of the environmental problems that we often encounter. The ecological ethics is thus crucial for ensuring effectiveness in establishing a cause for calling on the world to assume moral responsibility for the ravages wrought by the industrial society on the natural systems.


In conclusion, the efficient resolution of some of the environmental issues that tends to pose a significant threat to the biosphere necessitates new ways of thinking. The new ways of thinking necessitates the inclusion of the new economic models, broad philosophical thought, and scientific thinking. The true hope for the future thus lies in the capability of individuals to recognize the fact that people co-exist with all life within the sphere of intrinsic value. The good inherent nature often plays a significant role in fulfilling the good life of individuals by both the relational and instrumental values. As such, the discussion proves that as relational, moral agents, the humans have the moral obligation of ensuring effectiveness in the preservation of the biosphere since both the plants and animals possess intrinsic moral value.

Fresh review article about ThePensters website and services it provides

In the present day, there’s a lot of scholastic freelance writing firms on the web that college students are unable to find out which to decide when they are in a pinch. Each one of them ensures a similar thing: great-standard paper freelance writing, 100% uniqueness, and on time shipment. But not each of them is as nice as they assert themselves to be, that is why I need evaluation websites to research the pros and cons. Hence, I will take and look at it by all methods attainable. I will go through the web site written content, the testimonials, and the pricing they deliver. I will seek for off-site sources including feedback and reviews on social media and stuff like that. I will also make an order for a document in order that I can check out for myself what they supply. This is the outcome of my detailed review of ThePensters company.

 Writer’s Practical experience and Aid

I spoke with an author, and as a first feeling, I assumed him to be a very well-informed individual with big contact knowledge. But nevertheless, I don’t think that my report was composed by the precise same man or women – it appears that it was furnished by somebody else purely. Sentence errors in all places, unusual phrase structures and substandard layout – very much like old clients discussed. I tried to have a revision, but sorry to say, some of my intentions was shot down. The customer aid wasn’t valuable, so I ultimately stop totally.


Price levels and Bonus Features

The principle of legal document writing websites is often this: very low price tag gets us a poor report, higher price ranges gets us a superb document. With, elements are particularly the opposing: I pay out a high price for a terrible report. The lowest cost (that I believe is a high school essay) starts at $17.95, and price tags will increase in accordance with the deadline. I was forced to pay $22 per page for my report, which I believe incredibly costly in comparison with the service that I received consequently. I revealed many discounts, coupons and a referral promo code, but it would chop too little from the price tag for it to really make a difference.


User’s Viewpoint on Product Quality

First and foremost, ThePensters seems to have a small rate amongst college students. I don’t discover how much of worthless it is, but the vast majority of students consider they thrown away treasured funds here. They presume that there were too many mistakes in their documents, leading them to be absolutely unusable. This website is apparently most likely a fraud since clients are attracted with pretty sample essays – and presented with catastrophic essays in return. The general idea is that the article authors are not native English speakers – or not even experienced English speakers in anyway.


So, do I consider this company is legit? Yeah. Is it fraud or scam? Absolutely. Paying ThePensters is much like throwing your funds inside the fire pit. My rank for this one is weak, and I suggest that students hunt for an alternate company if they prefer at the very least an average quality paper.

Check out my detailed review of products and services of EssayTigers company

As a student, you could want the support of an experienced professional freelance writing organization occasionally when things become insanely bustling. In these kind of situations, you might want to make use of a company that is actually reliable and grants high-quality items. However, how will you know for sure that a service supplies good value for the funds paid? It’s very simple, by going through the independent evaluations I deliver for you!

My review of EssayTigers has been asked for for a lot of times. Therefore, I implemented the actions that enable me to produce one, specifically investigating customer reviews, analyzing the content on the web site, reports provided, and ordering a report from the website. What was my result? Go on reading to learn about even more features.

 What options can you decide on?

Starting out, the services available from Essay Tigers are the popular number of services, which enlist lab reports, research papers, book reports, dissertations, and theses.

I made a decision to purchase an piece of paper of four pages, with a 2 weeks deadline. I’m not joyful to inform you that the outcome was completely totally different from what I had needed. The quality of the composing was inadequate, and the paper was loaded with grammatical and structural mistakes. From the web site, I uncovered that they run in London, but the article writers weren’t native English speakers, needless to say.

Considering that I weren’t pleased about the report I been given, I was presented a cost-free revision, which I contentedly accepted. Then again, I didn’t observe any sort of distinction in the slightest degree; the piece of paper was yet still loaded with mistakes. In the same value, the more significant part of customer reviews I read discuss perhaps the most common problem – reduced grade, also plagiarism.


 Is the staff members competent?

When I mentioned my disappointment with regards to the inadequately penned paper I was given, the user support member of staff was polite, he apologized for the firm and presented me the totally free revising. I highly preferred that the customer aid staff were helpful and well mannered, but that didn’t assist me in any way simply because the modification provided didn’t improve the report.

I reveal to you that isn’t fraud or scam, but you should really, on the other hand, be worried about improperly authored educational materials.


Price levels and Discount rates

The costs aren’t excessive or too minimal, and they vary from $13 to $50 a page. Because of the fact my essay was common, a page cost $15. Had the essay been well-written, I would have been really very happy with the rate. Nonetheless, I was feeling robbed, considering the critical discrepancy. I didn’t find virtually any discount rates, bonus coupon codes, or promo code for fresh consumers.


On the whole, taking a look at all the details identified in my evaluation, my score of is terrible. I don’t recommend you to use this organization.